Legal Opinion

Kane Plaza Associates v. Chadwick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1997No. COA96-230PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Plaintiff Kane Plaza Associates (Kane Plaza) appeals the trial court’s 2 August 1993 order pursuant to N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissing Kane Plaza’s cause of action demanding payment on a promissory note. We reverse the trial court.

Pertinent allegations of Kane Plaza and procedural history are as follows: On or about 1 December 1988, defendants executed a $40,000 promissory note (the note) payable to J. M. Kane & Co. (J. M. Kane) or order. The note recited “assumption of lease by maker,” referring to a lease [the original lease] on premises in Pitt County, North Carolina, as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Azzolino v. DingfelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Barnaby v. BoardmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Morton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. First Federal Bank v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Miller v. RoseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Barclays Bank PLC v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Kyle v. FelfelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API