Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Felfel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2017No. COA16-1318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

*685 This case requires us to consider whether a promissory note is unenforceable where a failure to abide by the statute of frauds invalidated the consideration intended to support the note. Defendants Helmi L. Felfel and Laura C. Felfel (the "Felfels") appeal from the trial court's order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following a jury verdict finding that the Felfels breached their obligations under the note. Because we conclude that the promissory note was unenforceable for lack of consideration, we reverse.

*251 Factual and Procedural Background

In 2007,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. McLamb v. T.P., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Mezzanotte v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. BennettNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API