Legal Opinion

Azzolino v. Dingfelder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1985No. 718PA84PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action brought by a child and his parents and siblings alleging that the defendants’ negligent failure to advise the parents properly of the availability of amniocentesis and genetic counseling and negligent prenatal care of the mother prevented the termination of the mother’s pregnancy by abortion and thereby resulted in the child’s birth. The child is afflicted with Down’s Syndrome, a genetic disorder characterized by mental retardation and physical abnormalities. We conclude that neither the parents’ claim for relief for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API