Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Cibula
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 25, 1998No. 89,551PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
725 So.2d 360 (1998)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Frank G. CIBULA, Jr., Respondent.
No. 89,551.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 25, 1998.
Rehearing Denied February 9, 1999.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Tallahassee, Florida, and Ronna Friedman Young, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for Complainant.
Robert A. Springer of Springer & Springer, Palm Springs, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar and the referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Frank G. Cibula, Jr. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.
At issue in this case is…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- The Florida Bar v. SpannSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Dodd v. the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. GermainSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- The Florida Bar v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. MogilSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.