Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Feinberg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 1, 2000No. SC93165PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

760 So.2d 933 (2000)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Daniel Peter FEINBERG, Respondent.

No. SC93165.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1, 2000.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John A. Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida, and Stephen C. Whalen, Assistant Staff Counsel, Tampa, Florida, for Complainant.

Arthur I. Jacobs of Jacobs & Associates, P.A., Fernandina Beach, Florida, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

The Florida Bar petitions this Court to review a referee's report recommending that Daniel Peter Feinberg be publicly reprimanded for violating certain Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Suarez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. The Florida Bar v. SpannSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. The Florida Bar v. ReedSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. The Florida Bar v. SweeneySupreme Court of Florida · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. People v. PautlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 13-25 re: Andrew J. Decker, IIISupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. In re KeitelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 13-25 Re: Andrew J. Decker, III – Corrected OpinionSupreme Court of Florida · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API