Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Lord

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 1983No. 61649PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

433 So.2d 983 (1983)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

William A. LORD, Respondent.

No. 61649.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 9, 1983.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Jacquelyn Plasner Needelman, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.

William H. Pruitt of Pruitt & Pruitt, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This attorney-discipline proceeding is before the Court on petition of The Florida Bar. Before us, we have the report of the referee and the petition of The Florida Bar for review thereof. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Alderman; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · McDONALD; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Ehrlich.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. The Florida Bar v. VernellSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. The Florida Bar v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. The Florida Bar v. BaronSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by39 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. The Florida Bar v. SpannSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. The Florida Bar v. KoronesSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API