Legal Opinion

Dodd v. the Florida Bar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 3, 1960PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

118 So.2d 17 (1960)

James A. DODD, Attorney at Law, Petitioner,

v.

THE FLORIDA BAR, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 3, 1960.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1960.

Richard H. Hunt, Miami, for appellant.

Marshall R. Cassedy, Tallahassee, for appellee.

2Per curiam

James A. Dodd, an attorney, has petitioned this Court to review a judgment of disbarment entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County.

Petitioner's principal contention before us is that the "highly suspect, conflicting evidence" presented by the State Attorney does not prove the charges made against him by a clear preponderance and therefore does…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. CalhoonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. The Florida Bar v. GermainSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Ocampo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. The Florida Bar v. LancasterSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API