Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. MacMillan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 21, 1992No. 76563PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

600 So.2d 457 (1992)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Hugh MacMILLAN, Jr., Respondent.

No. 76563.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 21, 1992.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.

Alan C. Sundberg and F. Townsend Hawkes of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tallahassee, and Cecil H. Albury of Alley, Maass, Rogers & Lindsay, P.A., Palm Beach, for respondent.

2Per curiam

Hugh MacMillan, Jr. petitions for review of a referee's recommendations regarding guilt and sanctions against…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rules Regulating the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. The Florida Bar v. ShanzerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. The Florida Bar v. StalnakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. The Florida Bar v. HooperSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. The Florida Bar v. SchillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by46 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. The Florida Bar v. SpannSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. The Florida Bar v. LecznarSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. The Florida Bar v. CommitteSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API