Murta v. State

JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.

Paul Murta (Murta) appeals from an order denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. 1 Murta’s amended motion alleged, inter alia, that his guilty pleas were unknowing, unintelligent and involuntary because the plea court failed to inform Murta of the applicable ranges of punishment as required by Rule 24.02(b). The motion court found that Murta failed to prove that allegation and denied relief. This Court affirms.

On November 7, 2005, Murta was charged by three separate informations with committing one count of…