Elverum v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.
Introduction
Norman Elverum (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. 1 He raises four points on appeal. Movant claims that the motion court erred when it denied his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing because: 1) his plea counsel failed to advise him of the correct range of punishment for the crimes with which he was charged; 2) his sentenc ing counsel violated attorney-client privilege by telling the court that Movant had “picked up new charges in Colorado” and did so without verifying…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Crews v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bequette v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Rupert v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Voyles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ivory v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Murta v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.