Gooch v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Dale Wayne Gooch (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial following an evi-dentiary hearing of his postconviction mo tion filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 In his sole point relied on, he argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his two attorneys “unreasonably failed to move the trial court for a mental examination to determine if [he] was competent to proceed ... 2 We affirm the judgment and findings of the motion court.
Movant was charged by “Information in a Felony Case” with three counts of the unclassified felony of statutory sodomy in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Huth v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prince v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- CORY D. JONES, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Gallagher v. GallagherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- MICHAEL ANDREW HURST, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. PlasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013