Legal Opinion
Haft v. United States Steel Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 1982No. 1003PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend that the lower court erred in: (1) applying the three-year statute of limitations of the Wage Payment and Collection Law 1 to their claim; and (2) denying their motion for class action certification. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Appellants filed a class action in assumpsit on June 26, 1979, seeking to collect payments for certain Sunday, holiday, and overtime work performed for appellee, United States Steel Corporation. Appellants are retired foremen and management personnel below the level of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kelly v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Cambanis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Allegheny County Housing Authority v. BerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Laborers Combined Funds v. MatteiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Canulli v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.