Legal Opinion

Allegheny County Housing Authority v. Berry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1985No. 01034 and 01151 Pittsburgh, 1982PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellants appeal from the denial of their motion for certification of their counterclaim as a class action. In their brief, appellants argue the lower court erred in applying an incorrect legal standard requiring appellants/defendants to state a cause of action and to prove the merits of the counterclaim in deciding the motion for class certification.

This case originated when appellee/plaintiff, Allegheny County Housing Authority (ACHA), filed suit against twenty tenants of the Cochrandale Housing Project for rent due and owing under the Pennsylvania Landlord/Tenant Act. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Pugh v. HolmesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Weismer v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Cook v. Highland Water & S. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Baldassari v. Suburban Cable TV Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Foust v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API