Legal Opinion
Greenly v. Davis
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 17, 1984PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant, William A. Greenly, filed a suit in the Superior Court against defendants-appellees, William K. Davis and Kathleen Davis, alleging a breach of a contract for the sale of stock in two corporations. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction and for insufficiency of notice to the nonresident defendants of substituted service of process. The Superior Court granted defendants' motion ruling that the Court lacked jurisdiction and that notice of the service of process had not met statutory requirements.
On appeal, plaintiff contends that: (a)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Eudaily v. Harmon Ex Rel. HarmonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Moore v. Little Giant Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Harmon Ex Rel. Harmon v. EudailySuperior Court of Delaware · 1979
- ALTECH Industries, Inc. v. AL TECH Specialty Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc. v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1996
- Boone v. Oy Partek AbSuperior Court of Delaware · 1997
- Leatherbury v. GreenspunSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.