Legal Opinion

Harmon Ex Rel. Harmon v. Eudaily

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 5, 1979PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Judge.

On September 22, 1978, a complaint was filed against defendants alleging negligent conduct on the part of defendant Eudaily, a physician, occurring on September 23, 1976. On the latter date Eudaily was a resident of the State of Delaware, licensed to practice medicine in this State maintaining an office in Georgetown, Delaware. Subsequently, and prior to the filing of the complaint in this action, defendant Eudaily left the State of Delaware and now resides and practices medicine in the State of Montana. Service was effected on Eudaily pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 3104, Delaware’s…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Furek v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Boone v. Oy Partek AbSuperior Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  4. Eudaily v. Harmon Ex Rel. HarmonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears PlcDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API