Legal Opinion
Leatherbury v. Greenspun
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 30, 2007No. 200, 2007PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant, Charles Leather-bury, appeals from final judgments entered by the Superior Court that dismissed his complaint as to all defendants on the basis that it was barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. The Superior Court rejected Leatherbury’s contention that he had tolled the two-year statute of limitations by complying with the “Notice of Intent to investigate” provisions of Title 18, section 6856(3) of the Delaware Code. The Superior Court ruled that Leatherbury’s efforts at complying with the statute had failed because he sent those…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Candlewood Timber Group, LLC v. Pan American Energy, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Reid v. SpazioSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. VertinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Dambro v. MeyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.