Legal Opinion

Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 23, 2005No. 101/266,2004PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice.

This case arises out of competing efforts of AeroGlobal Capital Management, LLC (“AeroGlobal”) and First Islamic Investment Bank, E.C. (“FIIB”), through its agents Cirrus Holding Company Limited (“CHCL”) and Crescent Capital Investments, Inc. (“Crescent”), to make substantial investments in Cirrus Industries, Inc. (“Cirrus”). AeroGlobal is the plaintiff below-appellant and cross appellee. Cirrus, CHCL and Crescent are the defendants below-appellees. FIIB is the defendant below-appellee and cross appellant.

In this opinion, we will begin by addressing FIIB’s cross appeal…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Doe v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Beard Research, Inc. v. KatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  3. Lyondell Chemical Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v. CampbellSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Sunline Commercial Carriers, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API