Legal Opinion

Eudaily v. Harmon Ex Rel. Harmon

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 4, 1980PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this medical malpractice case, we are asked to determine: (1) whether 10 Del.C. § 3104, 1 the Delaware Long-Arm Statute, applies to a defendant who was a resident of Delaware at the time the cause of action arose in Delaware but who later, before the time of the commencement of the suit, became a nonresident; and (2) whether § 3104 is operable when the cause of action arose prior to its enactment into law.

I

The facts in this appeal are undisputed and are as follows: In September 1978, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant physician and his hospital alleging that, in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Crescent/Mach I Partners, L.P. v. TurnerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  2. Furek v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Snyder v. Hampton Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
  4. Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears PlcDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API