Legal Opinion
Simmons v. Briggs
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1924No. Civ. No. 2702PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendants' demurrer to the plaintiff's fourth amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered in favor of defendants for costs. This appeal is from the judgment. The facts herein stated are taken from the allegations of the second cause of action stated in the complaint.
"On and prior to the 8th day of August, 1910, plaintiff and defendant Dwight H. Miller were husband and wife. . . . The defendant Gustavus S. Miller is the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Dolliver v. DolliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Peterson v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Original Mining & Milling Co. v. CasadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Sande v. SandeIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.