Legal Opinion

City of Cushing v. Pote

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1928No. 17806PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The city of Cushing, plaintiff in error here, desiring to obtain certain real estate belonging to defendants in error for the use of the city waterworks system, instituted condemnation proceedings under the law of eminent domain to obtain title thereto. The owners of the real estate, not being satisfied with the award for damages made by the qommissioners ¡appointed to appraise the premises, demanded a jury trial in the district court of Payne county. The jury in its verdict awarded damages in the sum of $5,250. Upon the suggestion of the trial judge the defendants in error filed a remittitur…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. GobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Smith v. Star Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. CostelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API