Legal Opinion
Fry v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 15, 1924No. 12374PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
This is an appeal to reverse a judgment of the district court of Creek county awarding and setting apart to the defendant in error the one-half undivided interest in a tract of land as an attorney’s fee.
On the 15th day of June, 1912, a written contract was executed by Mack Lowe, guardian of Tom Lowe, a minor, and the defendant in error, whereby the defendant in error was authorized to enter suit on behalf of said minor in the proper court for the recovery of the Haga Monday allotment, and whereby the defendant in error was to receive a fee of one-half of said land in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Capps v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- People v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Simms v. HobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Lambert v. KelleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.