Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. .Action by the Union National Bank of Bartlesville, Okla., against W. L. Norton, as guardian of the person and estate of Gretta E. Roth, nee Stokes, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants Gretta E. Roth, nee Stokes, and another bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtThacker, J.
Gretta E. Roth, nee Stokes, one of the plaintiffs in error, will be designated as defendant, and the Union National Bank of Bartlesville, one of the defendants in error, will be designated as plaintiff, in accord with their positions in the trial court, while the other parties will be designated by their proper names so far as it may be necessary to refer to them.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant upon a note for $1,800, plus interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum from the date of the note, and foreclosing a guardian’s mortgage to satisfy the same…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- La Bellman v. Gleason & Sanders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.