Nez Perce Tribe v. Cenarrusa
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
This is an original proceeding to determine the constitutionality of an amendment to Article 3, § 20 of the Idaho Constitution. The amendment clarifies Idaho’s policy on gambling and specifically prohibits casino gambling within the State. The issue presented by Petitioner’s amended petition is whether the legislature violated constitutionally mandated procedures for submitting a proposed amendment to the electorate.
I
BACKGROUND
On July 27, 1992, the Idaho Legislature met in special session to consider a constitutional amendment addressing the issue of gambling in Idaho. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- McBee v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. StateDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1994
- Idaho Watersheds Project v. State Board of Land CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Knox v. STATE EX REL. OTTERIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Idaho Endowment Fund Investment Board v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Brent Regan v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.