Legal Opinion
Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. State
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 27, 1994No. Civ. 92-0437-NPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RYAN, Senior District Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action, the Coeur d’Alene, Nez Perce, and Kootenai Indian tribes (“the Tribes”) are federally-recognized Indian tribes having tribal lands within the State of Idaho. Defendant in this matter is the State of Idaho (“the State” or “Idaho”). The Tribes and the State seek a declaratory judgment regarding their respective rights and obligations under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq. (“IGRA”). The ease has been submitted to the court for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.