Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Price

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1948No. 7464PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYATT, Justice.

Plaintiff, alleging that he possesses the required qualifications for holding the office of governor and seeks the nomination of the Democratic Party therefor at the coming nominating election of August 10, 1948, brought this original proceeding for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant Secretary of State, to accept and file his declaration and petitions for candidacy and to certify his name to the county auditors as a candidate to be voted on at said election, thereby directly challenging the validity of the amendment of Sec. 1, Article IV of our Constitution, approved and…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  4. Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API