Idaho Endowment Fund Investment Board v. Crane
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Justice.
This appeal addresses the validity of the 1998 amendments to Article IX, Sections 3 and 11 of the Idaho Constitution and the subsequently enacted Idaho School Bond Guaranty Act and related statutory amend*669ments.1 We uphold the amendments and the statutory enactments.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1998, the Idaho legislature adopted House Joint Resolution (H. J.R.) 8, which proposed to amend Sections 3 and 11 of Article IX of the Idaho Constitution. Section 1 of H.J.R.8 proposed several amendments to Article IX, § 3 including:
1. Change the name of the “Public School Fund”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- McBee v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harwood v. TalbertIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Hodge v. WaggonerIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Woodland Furniture, LLC v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Hodge v. WaggonerIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Idaho Endowment Fund Investment Board v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 2001