Legal Opinion

Idaho Endowment Fund Investment Board v. Crane

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2001No. 26304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This appeal addresses the validity of the 1998 amendments to Article IX, Sections 3 and 11 of the Idaho Constitution and the subsequently enacted Idaho School Bond Guaranty Act and related statutory amend*669ments.1 We uphold the amendments and the statutory enactments.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1998, the Idaho legislature adopted House Joint Resolution (H. J.R.) 8, which proposed to amend Sections 3 and 11 of Article IX of the Idaho Constitution. Section 1 of H.J.R.8 proposed several amendments to Article IX, § 3 including:

1. Change the name of the “Public School Fund”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McBee v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harwood v. TalbertIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hodge v. WaggonerIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Woodland Furniture, LLC v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hodge v. WaggonerIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Idaho Endowment Fund Investment Board v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API