Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. West

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 2005PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Mark West, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on July 14, 2004. In this case, we must determine the proper remedy when a defendant alleges counsel’s ineffectiveness for failure to file a Concise Statement of Matters Complained of on Appeal under Pa.R.A.P. 1925. Given our Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Commonwealth v. Halley, 870 A.2d 795 (Pa.2005), we hold that the proper remedy is to remand for the filing of a Concise Statement.

¶ 2 The trial court stated the factual and procedural history as follows:

On June 7, 2004, appellant pled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. PresleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API