Legal Opinion
Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 4 of Bixby
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1990No. 89-5111PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This case involves an action brought under the Education of All Handicapped Children’s Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1485 (1989), as implemented by 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.1-300.-754 (1989) (collectively referred to as “the Act”). Natalie Johnson is a severely and multiply handicapped child who was eight years old at the time her local school district rejected her parents’ request for a structured summer educational program. Natalie’s parents invoked the due process provisions of the Act, and the schools’ decision was administratively and judicially affirmed. There are two issues on appeal: (1) What…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dellmuth v. MuthSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Randy Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma Mayor Curtis Conley and Police Chief Benny DirckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Irving Independent School District v. TatroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scanlon v. BattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McQueen v. Colorado Springs School District No. 11Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Sytsema Ex Rel. Sytsema v. Academy School District No. 20Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Brennan v. Regional School District No. 1 Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Miller Ex Rel. SM v. BOARD OF EDU. OF ALBUQUERQUEDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2006
- M.S. Ex Rel. J.S. v. Utah Schools for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.