Legal Opinion
Randy Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma Mayor Curtis Conley and Police Chief Benny Dirck
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1990No. 86-1392PublishedCited by 310 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Randy Abercrombie, brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against the City of Catoosa, Mayor Curtis Conley, and Police Chief Benny Dirck, alleging two counts: (1) a conspiracy in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 1986 arising out of alleged intimidation and retaliation against him because of his testimony in an unrelated case in federal court; and (2) a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of a property interest without due process of law and for interference with plaintiffs first amendment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by310 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jimmy Blackburn v. Marshall City OfCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Pritchett v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of NorthlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.