Legal Opinion
McQueen v. Colorado Springs School District No. 11
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2007No. 06-1169PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Joshua McQueen, formerly a student in Colorado Springs School District Number 11 (the District), suffers from autism. Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482, he is entitled to a free appropriate public education (FAPE), id. §§ 1400(d)(1)(A), 1412(a)(1)(A). Joshua, through his parents, claims that the District’s policy limiting extended-school-year (ESY) sendees (provided during the summer) to maintenance of previously learned skills violates the IDEA because such services must be designed to meet the unique need of autistic…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. Jefferson County School District R-1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Association for Community Living in Colorado v. RomerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ellenberg Ex Rel. S.E. v. New Mexico Military InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Smith v. Cheyenne Retirement InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States of America ex v. Keypoint Government SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Gad v. Kansas State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Miller v. Board of Education of the Albuquerque Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Muskrat Ex Rel. J.M. v. Deer Creek Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.