Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Whiting Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at March Term, 1911, of GRAHAM.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is an action for damages for an injury sustained while operating a lathe machine for the defendant. The plaintiff contended that the proximate cause of his injury was the failure of the defendant to furnish a guard or shield to go over the saws to prevent their throwing splinters and -pieces of wood back, by reason of which defect the plaintiff was injured.

It is settled law in this State, “That an employer of labor to assist in the operation of railways, mills, and other plants where the machinery is more or less complicated, and more especially where driven by mechanical power, is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Witsell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Sims v. . LindsaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Helms v. South Atlantic Waste Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Ainsley v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Jefferson v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API