Legal Opinion

Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

When considered in tbe light most favorable to plaintiff, we are of opinion that as to tbe defendant Eailroad Company tbe evidence is insufficient to require that an issue of negligence be submitted to tbe jury. Harton v. Telephone Co., 146 N. C., 430, 59 S. E., 1022; Lineberry v. R. R., 187 N. C., 786, 123 S. E., 1; Thompson v. R. R., 195 N. C., 663, 143 S. E., 186; Craver v. Cotton Mills, 196 N. C., 330, 145 S. E., 570; Boyd v. R. R., 200 N. C., 324, 156 S. E., 507; Hinnant v. R. R., 202 N. C., 489, 163 S. E., 555; Baker v. R. R., 205 N. C., 329, 171 S. E., 342; Newell v. Darnell, 209 N.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Quam Ex Rel. Quam v. WengertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Brooks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Livingston v. Seaboard Air Line R.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API