Legal Opinion

Marks v. Cotton Mills.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1904PublishedCited by 71 opinions

ActioN by W. H. Marks against the Harriet Cotton Mills, heard by Judge O. H. Allen and a jury, at October Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of EuehaM County. Eroin a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant's negligence. He alleges that the defendant employed him to operate one of the machines in its cotton mill, called a speeder, and that he was ordered by the boss or foreman to clean the machine while it was running; that the cog-wheels of the speeder were not boxed or cased as they should have been, and that owing to its condition it was dangerous to run the machine at a great speed, as was done by the defendant while the plaintiff was cleaning it, all of which was unknown to him, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harley v. Buffalo Car Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Summerlin v. Carolina & North-Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Tillett v. Norfolk & Western R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Dorsett v. Clement-Ross Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Hicks v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API