Jefferson v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogden, J.
The law of this State is that an employer of labor is required to exercise ordinary care in providing employees with reasonably safe methods and means to do the work for which they are employed. Thus, in Noble v. Lumber Co., 151 N. C., 76, it is said: “It is elementary learning that it is the duty of the master to furnish his servant a reasonably safe method, as far as practicable, for doing his work.” Again, in Terrell v. Washington, 158 N. C., 282, it is held: “The master fails to supply a safe place for work if he allows work to be conducted there in a manner needlessly dangerous to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Drum v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Terrell v. . WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Noble v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Hall v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- West v. . Mining CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Maulden v. High Point Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Watson ex rel. Watson v. Warsaw Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.