Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1945No. 31593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by the plaintiff, L. C. Montgomery, to obtain injunctive relief against the. defendants, as officers, and the city of Oklahoma City in the enforcement of an allegedly void ordinance. The cause was tried to the court and the temporary restraining order first issued was dissolved and a general judgment denying the injunctive relief was rendered for the ' defendants. Plaintiff appeals and in five allegations of error presents the single proposition that the attempted enforcement of the ordinance is illegal, oppressive, and that its operation and enforcement deprives him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Mitchell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. In Re San ChungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. McMann v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Utility Supply Co., Inc. v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Claxton v. BarrowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. City of Enid v. RamerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API