Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Lawton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1926No. 16612PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

W. W. Mitchell was convicted in the municipal -court of the city of Lawton of the offense ■of conducting a merchandise auction without a license. He appealed to the county ■court, and executed an appeal bond in the sum of $100, with A. H. Osborn and W. K. Miller as sureties thereon, conditioned that he personally appear before the county court of Comanche county on the first day of the next term of said court; and with the oth■er conditions contained in the ordinary appeal bond. The defendant filed in the county court a demurrer to the complaint, the ■grounds of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor, Cleveland & Co. v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. City of Muskogee v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. City of Tulsa v. Metropolitan Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. State Ex Rel. Voyles v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Red Slipper Club, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Ex Parte DickisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Wright v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Ex Parte Robert DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Montgomery v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API