In Re San Chung
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for discharge from custody upon writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Petitioner is held in custody by virtue of a commitment issued out of the justice court of the city of Sacramento based upon a trial and conviction for the violation of section 3 of Ordinance No. 824 of said city, providing that “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association of persons to establish, maintain, operate or carry on a public laundry or wash-house within the corporate limits of the city of Sacramento in any building, or any portion thereof, or in any annex or outhouse thereto, that shall be occupied or used either directly or indirectly as a public hall,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ex parte LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Goodman v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Montgomery v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Pacific Gas & Electronic Co. v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.