Legal Opinion
Claxton v. Barrowman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1954No. 36020PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORN, Justice.
Plaintiff is a master plumber, having been issued a master plumber’s license in Oklahoma City, his place of residence, in May 1951, after having successfully passed the examination required by such city, pursuant to applicable statutory provisions, 11 O.S.1951 § 451 et seq.
February 2, 1953, plaintiff applied for a plumbing permit in the city of Norman, Oklahoma. His application was denied, and he was advised it would be necessary to make application, post a required fee, and take an examination at a later date before he could be granted a permit. These matters resulted in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Horwith v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bankers Union Life Ins. Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Collinsville v. BrickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Collins v. PriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Montgomery v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roberts v. City of BethanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Bearden Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970