Legal Opinion
Hud/Barbour-Waverly v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 26, 1995No. 15177PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal1 is whether, in an appeal from a judgment of possession in a summary process eviction proceeding, the failure of the defendant to comply with the five day time limit specified by General Statutes § 47a-35 deprived the *652Appellate Court of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff, HUD/Barbour-Waverly, is the owner and operator of Chappelle Gardens, an apartment complex located at 108 Waverly Street, Hartford, in which the defendant, Lenora Wilson, formerly resided.2
On November 24,1992, the plaintiff, pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-15,3 sent the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doe v. MarselleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.