Legal Opinion
W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 31, 1963No. 40272PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
The principal question to be determined in this appeal is whether or not a condition in the bond of a developer of a sub-division, required by the city planning commission, to pay for materials and labor furnished, and which condition was not specifically provided for either in the statute or in the ordinance authorizing such commission to accept such bond, is enforceable in suit brought by a lien claimant.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, initiated the action from which this appeal arises against defendants in error, Ferguson Investment Company, Inc., and M.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lowe v. the City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Bell v. United Farm Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Applications of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Loeffler v. Federal Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- City of Duncan Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Hewson Construction, Inc. v. Reintree Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Parker Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Ply v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Hydro Conduit Corp. v. American-First Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.