Legal Opinion

Bell v. United Farm Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1956No. 36752PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORN, Justice.

George A. Bell, a licensed realtor residing in Carlsbad, New Mexico, brought this action seeking to recover a portion of broker’s commission received by defendants from a real estate transaction. Prior to judgment Bell died, but the action was revived by appropriate proceedings and the appeal is prosecuted by the executrix of the estate. The following matters sufficiently disclose the factual background out of which this appeal arose.

One Pixler, resident of New Mexico, had commissioned Bell to find him a ranch in the southwestern part of the United States. Defendants, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howell v. NorthNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hawkins v. WhayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ross v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Bishop v. Takata Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Furr v. Fonville Morisey Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Nicholas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API