Legal Opinion

Applications of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1954No. 36723-36725PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

The applicant, Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, hereinafter referred to as the “Authority,” made provision ■ by proper resolutions for three bond issues of Turnpike Revenue Bonds for the construction of three toll turnpikes in Oklahoma; one bond issue for the “Northern Turnpike” in the sum of $63,000,000; one, bond issue for the “Southwestern Turnpike” in the sum of $83,000,000, and one bond issue for the “Northeastern Turnpike” in the sum of $68,000,000. The purpose of these bond issues was to obtain funds to construct the “Northern Turnpike”- from Oklahoma City, or from near the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. David Jeffrey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ennis v. State Highway CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Allen v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re Board of Regents for Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical CollegesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API