Legal Opinion
Hydro Conduit Corp. v. American-First Title & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1986No. 84-2680PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The undisputed facts establish that defendant Hudiburg Investments, Inc. (Developer) submitted a final plat for a new subdivision to the City of Oklahoma City for approval. The plat contained specifications for improvements, including the installation of sanitary and storm sewers. Pursuant to state law and local regulations, Developer was allowed to post a bond instead of actually completing the improvements provided for in the plat. Accordingly, it executed a bond in favor of Oklahoma City with American-First Title & Trust Co. (American-First Title) as surety. The bond…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lowe v. the City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SutfinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- New York Casualty Co. of New York v. Wallace & Tiernan, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Mary Wilson Murphy v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,395 Dennis Winchester and John Winchester v. Lester's of Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- 49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1188, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,974 Gina Manders and Vinnie Payton Hoover v. The State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health and Eastern State Hospital, and Laroe HaneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Farnsworth v. Town Of PinedaleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.