Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Parker Pest Control, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1987No. 63826PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

The telephone company sued for $3867.00, the unpaid balance on a yellow pages advertising contract. The pest control company defended on the basis that it had paid for all that the services were worth, and that the phone company had so misrepresented the business benefits of the advertising that it amounted to fraud. Just before trial defendant, pursuant to 12 O.S.1981 § 1101, offered to confess judgment in the sum of $1500.00. Plaintiff accepted the offer, leaving only the question of attorney fees unresolved. The trial court awarded the plaintiff telephone company a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Baruch v. GiblenSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Finnell v. SeismicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Green Bay Packaging v. Preferred Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API