Legal Opinion

EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. Atkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1956No. 525PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNB, C. J.

At the outset, while defendant entered exceptions Numbers 12 and 37, respectively, to the action of the trial court in denying his motions for judgment as of nonsuit made first when plaintiff rested its case, and renewed at the close of all the evidence, there is no assignment of error based on these exceptions. Hence they will be deemed to be abandoned. Rule 19(3) of Rules of Practice in Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at 554.

In this connection it is noted that appellant debates in his brief these two exceptions. Suffice it to say, as declared in S. v. Dew, 240 N.C. 595, 83 S.E. 2d 482,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Darden v. BoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API