Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. . Higgins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1939PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWikborNe, J.

When on trial in partition proceeding, defendants, having denied tenancy in common, plead sole seizin, non ienent insimul, by reason of deed to them from common source, and, the proceeding-having been transferred to the civil issue docket for trial, plaintiffs fail before the jury in their attack upon that deed on the ground that the grantor did not have sufficient mental capacity, at the time, to execute it, and final judgment sustaining the plea of sole seizin is entered, is such judgment res adjudicata, and, when pleaded, a bar to prosecution of subsequent independent action to set aside…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  2. Tuttle v. . HarrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Alexander v. . GibbonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Piedmont Wagon Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Painter v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API