Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1963No. Civ. 199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from an order in a stockholders’ derivative action staying proceedings as to the first and second causes of action until 10 days after determination of a motion pursuant to Corporations Code section 834, subdivision (e), to require plaintiffs to furnish security as to the third cause of action.

The issues presented by this appeal should never arise again since they represent ramifications emanating from an appeal from an order that has since been held to be nonappealable. The original appeal, Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co., 180 Cal.App.2d 289 [4 Cal.Rptr. 474] (hearing denied by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cooper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Clary v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Ponce-Bran v. Trustees of California State University & CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API