Legal Opinion
Albert Neumann v. Henri Vidal
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 21, 1983No. 82-1685PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES F. GORDON, Senior District Judge:
This appeal challenges a summary judgment entered by the district court dismissing allegations of abuse of process and anti-competitive acts proscribed by the Clayton Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 15 (1976) and 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (1976)). The parties are rival developers of designs for earth retaining walls used near highways and other structures. We hold that appellants did raise genuine issues as to material facts, looking at the record in the light most favorable to the non-movant. We therefore must reverse and remand this action,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Robert H. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gerry Scott v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Whelan v. AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories, Andrew J. Muetterties and Joseph N. Genese, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. John F. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Albert Neumann v. The Reinforced Earth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Edwards v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.