Legal Opinion
Albert Neumann v. The Reinforced Earth Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 25, 1986No. 84-5532PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORK, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered by the district court in favor of the defendant, now the appellee, Reinforced Earth Company (“RECO”), 594 F.Supp. 139. Appellants, Albert Neumann, et al, seek reinstatement of the jury’s finding that RECO violated section 2 of the Sherman Act by attempting to monopolize a market for retaining walls. That attempt, the jury found, consisted of engaging in “sham litigation” against Neumann and his company in order to keep them out of the market. Because we find that appellants failed to define a proper…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.