Legal Opinion
Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 20, 1977No. 75-1819PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
This is a private antitrust action. Plaintiffs Hecht, Kagan, and Miller (hereafter collectively “Hecht”) are a group of promoters who in 1965 sought unsuccessfully to obtain an American Football League (AFL) franchise for Washington, D.C. Defendants are Pro-Football, Inc., operator of the Washington Redskins (the Redskins), and the District of Columbia Armory Board, an unincorporated instrumentality of the District of Columbia which operates and maintains Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) Stadium under contract with the Interior…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Twin Laboratories, Inc. v. Weider Health & Fitness, a Corporation, I, Brute Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Steve L. McKenzie D.O. v. Mercy Hospital of Independence, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.